Translate
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Larry - We Gotta Save Tennessee from Tennessee. Lets Communicate People Their American Rights... Mine Were Taken Away in Tennessee
Please Help Tennessee.. The Courts are Out of Control. Everyday an Innocent Person Loses Their Freedom. Some of the lawyers & judges work together. I've spend hours watching family court. The decisions in Williamson County are NOT fair. A female bus drive told me that an "unusual" amount of children are living with their dad's something is fishy happening in Williamson County.
Larry - Sometimes When the Facts are Clear.. It's Easy to See The Grand Jury System in America Needs to Be Abolished & That NISSAN is NOT Nice.
"a grand jury would 'indict a ham sandwich,' if that's what you wanted" New York State chief judge Sol Wachtler
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) -- Some officials are expressing concerns about a new policy to post free digital recordings online of oral arguments from all of Tennessee's appeals courts.
the "Victim" of Stalking MUST be an INDIVIDUAL
Sharyn Bovat Was Jailed TWICE for Stalking/Harassment of NISSAN.
Bovat sent emails to executives telling them NOT to waste taxpayer money & to stop discriminating. Women in management at NISSAN went from 20.9% in 2006 down to 10% in 2009. www.NISSANWhistleblower.com
NISSAN Hired a Lawyer That Appeared at Grand Jury. The NISSAN head of corporate security testified against Sharyn - BUT NISSAN says they were "not involved".
Bovat Was NOT Allowed to Defend herself & NOBODY Told the Grand Jury that the Stalking code in Tennessee CLEARLY states that the victim is an INDIVIDUAL.
Bovat did NOT stalk NISSAN....
Twice the Charge was dropped.
Bovat lost credibility due to the charges. Sharyn Bovat was told in spring 2009 that NISSAN had 77 lawyers in Franklin. Yet Joe Baugh a former DA was hired from day 1 to "baby sit" the case. Why? If this was "truly" the actions of Just Terry Wood the ADA.
Judge Jeff Bivins let a faulty case continue & told Bovat he'd have her in jail for a year. Sharyn is 47 years old & has NEVER done anything wrong. She had a clean record. UNTIL the State of Tennessee let NISSAN "Swear Out" a Trespass charge & harassment charge. The trespass charge is "sketchy" Bovat was found guilty had to pay the "maximum" $50 fine - it's = to a speeding ticket. Still She claims she's innocent and says "educated people" know that she was railroaded. It's ALL about her blogging. Thank god Freedom of Speech is still allowed in America. NISSAN was trying to make Sharyn Bovat quiet... That is why her life has been hell. www.NISSANWhistlblower.com
Judge Robbie Beal quashed MOST of Bovat's Subpoenas.
Judge Time Easter Knowing that Bovat just lost her legal council for a valid reason did NOT give her time to prepare a defense at a Summary Judgment. Bovat's lawyer withdrew on January 14th.
January 28th he dismissed Bovat's malicious prosecution case based on:
1) Grand Jury Indictment = Probable Cause
2) Case was dropped on Technical Issue (yet that's how a case like this is DROPPED).
3) An affidavit from the Williamson County ADA Terry Wood - who took a case that he know would be overturned in an Appeals court to a Grand Jury. Terry Wood made false statements in reference to a pre-trial diversion that he says he offered Bovat. Worse he lied and Bovat proved that in a motion she filed with the court.
Matt Largen of Williamson County - Relocate Me OUT of Tennessee ...
mattlargen.blogspot.com/.../web-stats-show-williamson-county...Share
Jan 15, 2013 – From Jalopnik Article Oct. 5th, 2010 Williamson County ADA Terry Wood said Sharyn Bovat did not mention the Leaf prior to Oct 2010. That is ...
You +1'd this
Sharyn Bovat wants her reputation back and will take it to the SUPREME Court if needed: Educated people KNOW that Bovat was "wronged"
Those that know local politics and NISSAN's "close" relationship with the courts want Sharyn to fight to stop the Good Ole Boys. Too much bond debt to a foreign com pay that does NOT provide the jobs promised. A company that has taken federal money because in 2009 they had a "cash flow" problem. NISSAN marketing said it's to build a mass market EV - The NISSAN leaf is a flop. Just as Bovat blogged.
Jon Brancheau the VP of marketing "dodged" his subpoenas... Guess he didn't get the memo that the constitution is NOT a valid document in Tennessee. His was quashed. Brancheau connected with Bovat on Linkedin AFTER she was identified the #2 security threat for NISSAN. Who "connects" with the NISSAN Stalker? Why would the man that Terry Wood "repeatedly" says had he been at the trial would have said I stalked him.... Still Carlos Tavares (as of November 2012) uses my address for his COSTCO membership.
In court on monday I told the judge "David Letterman would not use his stalkers address for a COSTCO membership" he still sided with NISSAN.
The judge knowing my lawyer had to withdraw due to "Conflict of Interest" Google " Stephen Preston CIA" The court STILL did NOT give me time to prepare....
Judge Easter just let NISSAN "off the hook".... What do I do now? I know Appeal... but I need to work the stress is horrible. NISSAN is still abusing taxpayer money.
In court on monday I told the judge "David Letterman would not use his stalkers address for a COSTCO membership" he still sided with NISSAN.
The judge knowing my lawyer had to withdraw due to "Conflict of Interest" Google " Stephen Preston CIA" The court STILL did NOT give me time to prepare....
Judge Easter just let NISSAN "off the hook".... What do I do now? I know Appeal... but I need to work the stress is horrible. NISSAN is still abusing taxpayer money.
Also .... He never did an affidavit...saying Sharyn Bovat stalked him.
Thus those at NSSAN that were apart of "bad" real estate deals that hurt the average person in Franklin Tennessee. The city pays about 1 million in debt service - Just for the money they gave NISSAN. NISSAN has 3,950,000,000 in IDB Bond debt and another 2 Billion guarantee. When Carlos Ghosn "saved NISSAN" in the early 2000's ALL he did was "put the debt" on a credit card. NISSAN execs told me the subsidy Nissan North America is gonna go "bust" and America will not get back the 1.4 Billion tax dollars and those in Rutherford County will be liable. Bovat has stated on her blogs... if somethings NOT true call her and she'll CLARIFY. In reference to this issue ... SILENCE.
Appeals in Tennessee are Going to be ONLINE and Easily Available. Bovat was told hers could be one that gets LOTS of tweets. She has to learn how to "talk slow".... she will.
People that care about the constitution know what happened to the NISSAN Whistleblower was wrong.
When shopping for a car - people will know that if they buy a NISSAN their supporting those that "abuse" power.
A grand jury indictment is a formal, written charge issued by a grand jury in a criminal case. Typically, the jury is charged with determining whether enough evidence exists to charge a suspect with a criminal offense. The jury usually consists of 12 average people who are randomly selected. The use of a grand jury indictment is intended to ensure that a prosecutor brings a case to trial only if there is probable cause to support the crime was committed by a suspect.
The Grand Jury Could NOT Read the Statue....
Historically, a grand jury indictment was used for determining whether to bring criminal charges in a number of common law countries. For example, England, Australia, and Canada all usedgrand juries during the twentieth century. In modern times, grand jury indictments occur primarily in the United States. Only some of the states, however, still use these indictments in prosecuting crimes. Grand jury indictments are also used in the United States if federal chargesare brought in a criminal case.
1)
By and large, grand juries decide whether enough evidence exists for a suspect to be taken to trial. Grand jury proceedings are usually required to be kept confidential. In most grand jury indictment proceedings, a prosecutor presents evidence in the form of witness testimony. As a general rule, the prosecutor can subpoena any potential witness to provide testimony without showing that the witness is likely to have relevant information about the crime. Certain types of witnesses, such as a spouse or the suspect’s criminal lawyer, can sometimes claim a specific privilege in order to avoid answering the prosecutor’s questions. |
Typically, the suspect and his or her criminal attorney are not present during the grand jurytestimony. As a result, they usually do not have the opportunity to present any conflicting evidence. If a suspect wishes to testify, however, a prosecutor may permit the testimony.
If the grand jury determines that the case may be brought to trial, they issue a “true bill” decision, and the suspect is formally charged with the alleged crime. A “no true bill” decision is issued when the jury decides insufficient evidence exists for a criminal trial. The grand juryindictment itself is usually drafted by the prosecutor and simply approved by the jury. If a grandjury fails to indict a suspect, a prosecutor may try to indict the suspect again, using a secondgrand jury, although this practice is uncommon.
Jurisdictions that no longer use grand jury indictments in charging a crime usually have a preliminary hearing. At the hearing, the prosecution presents evidence relating to the crime to acriminal law judge. The judge then determines whether sufficient evidence exists for trial.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Larry- With Google Translate I Can Complain About the French to the French... How Cool is That?
Carlos Ghosn prend des décisions horribles. En Amérique NISSAN discrimination et a commis une fraude en gaspillant l'argent des contribuables américains.
La femme qui a dirigé l'effort d'avoir défendus, les hommes qui étaient accusés d'être des espions à REANULT est toujours calomnié et harcelé par les dirigeants NISSAN connectés à Carlos Ghosn. Carlos Ghosn est connecté à des gens peu recommandables. Sharyn Bovat craint pour sa vie.
www.NISSANWhistleblower.com
S'il vous plaît Aide Sharyn
Larry - The French Want Carlos Ghosn's Head on a Platter. Remember Maria?
"I think we should change the Renault-Nissan boss because he has absolute proof of its ineffectiveness," said Jean-Luc Mélenchon Tuesday in three emission Evidence on Public Senate. "First it is very expensive, I think you could find a pattern that is less expensive for the results at least as interesting as his. Secondly, he left aside in favor Renault Nissan, this is say all unions of the company, "he said.
"So Carlos Ghosn is a bad boss, and I as a shareholder, I think we need to find another one, this one has run its course," insisted the leader of the Left Party. "It would be a worker, a foreman, an engineer who would have such performance against its assets, Carlos Ghosn would be replaced. Well we have to replace Carlos Ghosn because he is not good at all as a boss."
Renault hopes to reach an agreement in early February and PSA conclude discussions on the social level, including the terms of compensation for departures on other sites or outside the company in February or March.
Pour Mélenchon, Carlos Ghosn doit partir
Europe1-3 hours ago
"Donc Carlos Ghosn est un mauvais patron, et moi en tant qu'actionnaire, je pense qu'il faut en trouver un autre, celui-là a fait son temps", ...
|
Hydrogen cars have good range - clean energy.
NOW NISSAN is into Hydrogen cars...... One guy that worked with the Leaf technology told me hydrogen was the "way to go" for zero emissions. The refueling centers are expensive. He said if Obama didn't was so much money on "price" chargers on BETA technology then America could have been a LOT healthier .... At least it looks like FINALLY the DOE is listening..
Daimler Plans Joint Fuel-Cell Project With Nissan, Ford
(F) added Nissan Motor Co. as a partner in developing fuel cells for electric cars, which the manufacturers plan to start selling in 2017.
|
Just Yesterday on one blog.... Why do people in Kazakhstan care about the CORRUPT courts in Tennessee?
"We must question the strategy of Renault and CEO [...]. Carlos Ghosn is almost inaccessible, nobody sees, nobody meeting [...]. It is paid seven times more than the CEO of Toyota. "Laurent Berger, head of the CFDT, probably did not foresee would have echoed his remarks Monday on RTL. Unusual, challenged personal Renault boss was not involuntary. The union had already published a book in June, "Renault in danger," denouncing the industrial strategy of Carlos Ghosn. The preface to François Chérèque taclait himself a "management style focused on lowering costs and obsessed with managing the short term." According to the CFDT, the boss of Renault-Nissan is one of the few business leaders that the former secretary general has never met, despite his requests during his ten years in office.
ÉCONOMIE L'État demande à Carlos Ghosn de baisser son salaire
Le Dauphiné Libéré-9 hours ago
Le salaire de Carlos Ghosn, PDG de Renault, est dans le viseur du gouvernement. L'État lui réclame un “effort de décence”, alors que le ...
|
Salary Carlos Ghosn, CEO of Renault, in the viewfinder of government. The State calls him a "decent effort", while the manufacturer now finds its unions for negotiations on an agreement under voltage competitiveness.
CEO touched on the year nearly 13 million euros (9.92 million and 2.79 million Nissan Renault).
The Economy Minister Pierre Moscovici asked him yesterday to moderate wages. "The state as shareholder, is attentive to the remuneration of the chief executive, Carlos Ghosn," is he justified. A second call of the foot. Thursday, the Minister of Productive Recovery, Arnaud Montebourg, had estimated that it would "not unreasonable" to ask this effort.
Monday, January 28, 2013
Larry - My Friend Silverman is in Shock at Judges Decision. I Told HIm That's What Happens When the Media is Biased.
NISSAN Whistleblower Takes Expected Blow- It's NOT Over Grounds for Appeal- Video Message from Sharyn- She's STRONGER Than Before. Her "Ex" Lawyer Filed a Case Destined to Fail. Bovat Believes is Success and Respect for the Taxpayer
The ADA Lied in his affidavit & the affidavit is WHY the Judge Gave NISSAN Victory on Summary Judgement.
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Larry- Can YOU Please Tell NISSAN to Be Nice? Their Trying to Pin the Blame on Terry Wood the Williamson County ADA
All I did was blog about NISSAN executives "wasting money".... evidently it "terrorized" NISSAN.
The problem was you can't STALK a corporation. The Williamson County ADA knew this - If not Terry Wood retarded. The code specifically states that it's an INDIVIDUAL.
For over Almost 3 years Sharyn Bovat has been discredited...& the courts helped.
Terry Wood had nothing to gain by having a Grand Jury indict a person for "stalking a corporation"....
The law specifically says individual. On appeal it would be thrown out -
UNLESS he was acting as an "agent" for NISSAN. Terry Wood worked in California until 2007, is it true people from NISSAN helped get him his job?
NISSAN was able to draw down a 1.4 Billion dollar DOE loan. Nobody will say "how the money" was spent. NISSAN can't afford to pay the American taxpayers back. The collateral is a 2 Billion dollar Rutherford County IDB bond.
Can someone INVESTIGATE!!!!
The law specifically says individual. On appeal it would be thrown out -
UNLESS he was acting as an "agent" for NISSAN. Terry Wood worked in California until 2007, is it true people from NISSAN helped get him his job?
NISSAN was able to draw down a 1.4 Billion dollar DOE loan. Nobody will say "how the money" was spent. NISSAN can't afford to pay the American taxpayers back. The collateral is a 2 Billion dollar Rutherford County IDB bond.
Can someone INVESTIGATE!!!!
2010 Tennessee Code
Title 39 - Criminal Offenses
Chapter 17 - Offenses Against Public Health, Safety and Welfare
Part 3 - Disorderly Conduct and Riots
39-17-315 - Stalking, aggravated stalking, and especially aggravated stalking.
39-17-315. Stalking, aggravated stalking, and especially aggravated stalking.
(a) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) Course of conduct means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of two (2) or more separate noncontinuous acts evidencing a continuity of purpose;
(2) Emotional distress means significant mental suffering or distress that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling;
(3) Harassment means conduct directed toward a victim that includes, but is not limited to, repeated or continuing unconsented contact that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress, and that actually causes the victim to suffer emotional distress. Harassment does not include constitutionally protected activity or conduct that serves a legitimate purpose; The first charged dropped by Judge Al Nations... He said my emails could be "annoying" still Mr. Tavares NEVER said anything.
(4) Stalking means a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another individual that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested, and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested; Again Mr. Tavares NEVER did an affidavit- He never complained. I keep telling people I was a "change agent"... the goal was to stop the discrimination and corruption by using my blog. a man from NISSAN IT helped me AFTER I started blogging and AFTER I was deemed the #2 Security Risk. Tavares/NISSAN did design a car to stop me from whining about "how UGLY" NISSAN cars were - The Ellure.
2011 Nissan Ellure concept made its world debut at the LA auto show on November 17th 2010.Marketed for women in their 30’s and 40’s who have are sophisticated and rebellious.
(5) Unconsented contact means any contact with another person that is initiated or continued without that person's consent, or in disregard of that person's expressed desire that the contact be avoided or discontinued. Unconsented contact includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(A) Following or appearing within the sight of that person;
(B) Approaching or confronting that person in a public place or on private property;
(C) Appearing at that person's workplace or residence;
(D) Entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, or occupied by that person;
(E) Contacting that person by telephone;
(F) Sending mail or electronic communications to that person; or
(G) Placing an object on, or delivering an object to, property owned, leased, or occupied by that person; and
(6) Victim means an individual who is the target of a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment. No INDIVIDUAL at NISSAN ever complained except Rob and I NEVER emailed him (or at least don't remember) NOBODY in management did an affidavit.- Still I was asked out on a date. WHY? Why did Mr. Tavares still use my address for his COSTCO membership? Cars were shown to me that were "not yet" on the market. WHY? Chris Haley from Vantech called me on July 7th 2011- Told me a NISSAN Motors Corporate Officer told him I was "the best." & that person gave him my #.
(b) (1) A person commits an offense who intentionally engages in stalking.
(2) Stalking is a Class A misdemeanor.
(c) (1) A person commits aggravated stalking who commits the offense of stalking as prohibited by subsection (b), and: For 19+ months I thought I was going to do 1 year in jail for something that I did NOT do- and a crime that does not exist. The stress was bad!!!
(A) In the course and furtherance of stalking, displays a deadly weapon;
(B) The victim of the offense was less than eighteen (18) years of age at any time during the person's course of conduct, and the person is five (5) or more years older than the victim;
(C) Has previously been convicted of stalking within seven (7) years of the instant offense;
(D) Makes a credible threat to the victim, the victim's child, sibling, spouse, parent or dependents with the intent to place any such person in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury; or
(E) At the time of the offense, was prohibited from making contact with the victim under a restraining order or injunction for protection, an order of protection, or any other court-imposed prohibition of conduct toward the victim or the victim's property, and the person knowingly violates the injunction, order or court-imposed prohibition. I guess they connected the "trumped up" trespassing to this... shows how things "snowball" out of control.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)